Airbus ACJ320neo private jetBoeing BBJ 787 private jet

ACJ320neo vs BBJ 787

A head-to-head look at two of the most-chartered aircraft in the vip airliner class.

Airbus ACJ320neo

AIRBUS

Airbus ACJ320neo

The Airbus ACJ320neo is the next-generation VIP version of the A320neo — new Pratt & Whitney or CFM engines deliver 6,000 nm of range with a wide-body cabin that includes a master bedroom, conference room and dining for up to 25 passengers.

FULL AIRBUS ACJ320NEO PAGE →
Boeing BBJ 787

BOEING

Boeing BBJ 787

The Boeing BBJ 787 is the VIP version of the Dreamliner — 9,945 nm of range, composite fuselage with the lowest cabin altitude in commercial aviation (6,000 ft) and the largest passenger windows in any private aircraft.

FULL BOEING BBJ 787 PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICACJ320neoBBJ 787
Passengers19–2525+
Range6,000 nm9,945 nm
Cruise speedMach 0.82Mach 0.85
Cabin height7'4"8'1"
Cabin width12'1"18'0"
Baggage1,000+ cu ft3,000+ cu ft
Runway6,400 ft8,500 ft

Airbus ACJ320neo — strengths

  • Wide-body cabin at narrow-body operating cost
  • True intercontinental range with up to 25 passengers
  • Latest generation fuel-efficient engines

Boeing BBJ 787 — strengths

  • Composite Dreamliner airframe
  • Lowest cabin altitude in any commercial aircraft
  • Industry-leading window size and natural light

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

AIRBUS ACJ320NEO
Geneva → Beijingfrom CHF 348,000
Riyadh → Londonfrom $216,000
BOEING BBJ 787
Dubai → Los Angelesfrom $512,000
Riyadh → São Paulofrom $498,000

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

The BBJ 787 is the stronger all-rounder, but the ACJ320neo still wins where it counts for the right mission.

The ACJ320neo pulls ahead on airport access; the BBJ 787 answers with range / non-stop reach, cabin comfort and speed & block time. Both sit in the vip airliner class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

BBJ 787

9,945 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.

Cabin comfort

BBJ 787

Taller and/or wider cabin (8'1" × 18'0") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

Even

Matched specifications.

Airport access

ACJ320neo

Shorter 6,400 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

BBJ 787

Cruise of Mach 0.85 — shaves meaningful minutes off every long leg.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the ACJ320neo or the BBJ 787.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the ACJ320neo and BBJ 787: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

AIRBUS

Top reasons to choose the ACJ320neo

  • Lands in 6,400 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the BBJ 787 cannot.
  • Wide-body cabin at narrow-body operating cost
  • True intercontinental range with up to 25 passengers
  • Latest generation fuel-efficient engines

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    6,400 ft balanced field unlocks airports the BBJ 787 cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Delegations of 15–30

    Onboard meeting room, dining area and shower for large parties.

  • Private group charters

    Wedding, sports franchise and royal-tour scale travel in one cabin.

  • Multi-bedroom missions

    Three-bedroom layouts and staff cabin for week-long roaming itineraries.

BOEING

Top reasons to choose the BBJ 787

  • Reaches 9,945 nm non-stop — 66% more range than the ACJ320neo, opening city pairs that would otherwise need a tech stop.
  • Cruises at Mach 0.85, trimming block time on every leg vs the ACJ320neo (Mach 0.82).
  • Bigger cabin envelope (8'1" tall × 18'0" wide) than the ACJ320neo — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • 3,000+ cu ft of baggage volume — fits ski, golf and extended-stay luggage that crowds the ACJ320neo.
  • Composite Dreamliner airframe

BEST FOR

  • Longer non-stop reach

    When the mission is on the edge of the ACJ320neo's envelope, the 9,945 nm legs of the BBJ 787 keep reserves intact.

  • Delegations of 15–30

    Onboard meeting room, dining area and shower for large parties.

  • Private group charters

    Wedding, sports franchise and royal-tour scale travel in one cabin.

  • Multi-bedroom missions

    Three-bedroom layouts and staff cabin for week-long roaming itineraries.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

AIRBUS

Airbus ACJ320neo

PROS

  • +Wide-body cabin at narrow-body operating cost
  • +True intercontinental range with up to 25 passengers
  • +Latest generation fuel-efficient engines
  • +Shorter runway requirement (6,400 ft) unlocks airfields the BBJ 787 cannot use.

CONS

  • Shorter range than the BBJ 787 (6,000 nm vs 9,945 nm) — may require a tech stop on long sectors.
  • Slightly slower in cruise than the BBJ 787 (Mach 0.82 vs Mach 0.85).
  • Lower ceiling than the BBJ 787 (7'4" vs 8'1") — stand-up movement is restricted.
  • Tighter baggage capacity than the BBJ 787 (1,000+ cu ft vs 3,000+ cu ft).

BOEING

Boeing BBJ 787

PROS

  • +Composite Dreamliner airframe
  • +Lowest cabin altitude in any commercial aircraft
  • +Industry-leading window size and natural light
  • +Longer legs than the ACJ320neo (9,945 nm vs 6,000 nm) — fewer fuel stops on intercontinental missions.
  • +Faster cruise (Mach 0.85) trims block time on every leg vs the ACJ320neo.
  • +Taller cabin (8'1") than the ACJ320neo — easier to move around on long flights.

CONS

  • Needs more runway than the ACJ320neo (8,500 ft vs 6,400 ft) — fewer short-field options.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Head-of-state delegation of 18 with onboard meeting room and shower

OUR PICKACJ320neo

Larger cabin seats the full group (19–25).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Sports franchise charter, 25 passengers plus support staff, intercontinental

OUR PICKBBJ 787

Longer range (9,945 nm) wins the non-stop reach.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Private wedding charter to a remote luxury destination for 30 guests

OUR PICKACJ320neo

Curated example: London → Los Angeles sits in the ACJ320neo's sweet spot.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Multi-week royal tour with three-bedroom layout and onboard staff cabin

OUR PICKBBJ 787

Taller cabin (8'1") makes long-haul rest workable.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → Tokyo5,200 nmBBJ 787Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Riyadh → New York5,750 nmBBJ 787Only one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (5750 nm > 6,000 nm).
Dubai → Sydney6,400 nmBBJ 787Only one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (6400 nm > 6,000 nm).
Paris → Cape Town4,950 nmBBJ 787Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

ACJ320neo vs BBJ 787 — frequently asked

ACJ320neo vs BBJ 787: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Airbus ACJ320neo has a published range of 6,000 nm; the Boeing BBJ 787 is rated at 9,945 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — ACJ320neo or BBJ 787?OPEN

Cruise speeds are Mach 0.82 for the Airbus ACJ320neo and Mach 0.85 for the Boeing BBJ 787. On a Geneva → Beijing-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Airbus ACJ320neo seats 19–25; the Boeing BBJ 787 seats 25+. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Airbus ACJ320neo vs the Boeing BBJ 787?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Airbus ACJ320neo from from CHF 348,000, Boeing BBJ 787 from from $512,000. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the VIP Airliner category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more vip airliners

ACJ320NEO × BBJ 787 CLUSTER

Continue researching ACJ320neo or BBJ 787

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE