Dassault Dassault Falcon 900EX — Heavy Jet charter aircraftDassault Dassault Falcon 50EX — Heavy Jet charter aircraft

Falcon 900EX vs Falcon 50EX

Two Dassault heavy jets from the same stable, compared where it counts. The Dassault Falcon 900EX carries 12–14 passengers with 4,500 nm of range; the Dassault Falcon 50EX carries 9 with 3,200 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 6'2" × 7'8" versus 5'9" × 6'1", and runway numbers read 5,360 ft against 4,600 ft. Indicative charter pricing on a representative sector: from €58,000 on the Falcon 900EX, from $32,800 on the Falcon 50EX.

Manufacturer hubs:Dassault charter →
Dassault Falcon 900EX

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 900EX

The Dassault Falcon 900EX combines three-engine redundancy with 4,500 nm of intercontinental range and the short-runway capability that defines the Falcon family. A favorite for African, South American and steep-approach operations.

FULL DASSAULT FALCON 900EX PAGE →
Dassault Falcon 50EX

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 50EX

The Dassault Falcon 50EX is the only three-engine business jet in regular charter service — exceptional short-runway performance, 3,200 nm range and the unmistakable Falcon ride quality.

FULL DASSAULT FALCON 50EX PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICFalcon 900EXFalcon 50EX
Passengers12–149
Range4,500 nm3,200 nm
Cruise speedMach 0.84Mach 0.80
Cabin height6'2"5'9"
Cabin width7'8"6'1"
Baggage127 cu ft115 cu ft
Runway5,360 ft4,600 ft

Dassault Falcon 900EX — strengths

  • Three-engine ETOPS-style intercontinental capability
  • Steep-approach certified (London City compatible)
  • Widest cabin in heavy-jet class

Dassault Falcon 50EX — strengths

  • Three-engine redundancy
  • Short-runway capable heavy jet
  • Trademark Falcon cabin quietness

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

DASSAULT FALCON 900EX
Paris → Dubaifrom €58,000
Miami → Sao Paulofrom $54,000
DASSAULT FALCON 50EX
Miami → Aspenfrom $32,800
Paris → Athensfrom €28,400

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

The Falcon 900EX is the stronger all-rounder, but the Falcon 50EX still wins on the metrics that matter to specific buyers.

The Falcon 900EX pulls ahead on range / non-stop reach, cabin comfort, group capacity and speed & block time; the Falcon 50EX answers with airport access. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

Falcon 900EX

4,500 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.

Cabin comfort

Falcon 900EX

Taller and/or wider cabin (6'2" × 7'8") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

Falcon 900EX

Seats up to 14 — the right pick when the manifest grows.

Airport access

Falcon 50EX

Shorter 4,600 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

Falcon 900EX

Cruise of Mach 0.84 — shaves meaningful minutes off every long leg.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the Falcon 900EX or the Falcon 50EX.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the Falcon 900EX and Falcon 50EX: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

DASSAULT

Top reasons to choose the Falcon 900EX

  • Reaches 4,500 nm non-stop — 41% more range than the Falcon 50EX, opening city pairs that would otherwise need a tech stop.
  • Cruises at Mach 0.84, trimming block time on every leg vs the Falcon 50EX (Mach 0.80).
  • Bigger cabin envelope (6'2" tall × 7'8" wide) than the Falcon 50EX — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Seats up to 14 passengers vs 9 on the Falcon 50EX — better for full-group charters and family travel.
  • Three-engine ETOPS-style intercontinental capability

BEST FOR

  • Longer non-stop reach

    When the mission is on the edge of the Falcon 50EX's envelope, the 4,500 nm legs of the Falcon 900EX keep reserves intact.

  • Larger party charters

    Up to 14 seats vs 9 on the Falcon 50EX — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

DASSAULT

Top reasons to choose the Falcon 50EX

  • Lands in 4,600 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the Falcon 900EX cannot.
  • Three-engine redundancy
  • Short-runway capable heavy jet
  • Trademark Falcon cabin quietness

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    4,600 ft balanced field unlocks airports the Falcon 900EX cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 900EX

PROS

  • +Three-engine ETOPS-style intercontinental capability
  • +Steep-approach certified (London City compatible)
  • +Widest cabin in heavy-jet class
  • +Longer legs than the Falcon 50EX (4,500 nm vs 3,200 nm) — fewer fuel stops on intercontinental missions.
  • +Carries up to 14 passengers vs 9 on the Falcon 50EX — better for larger groups.
  • +Faster cruise (Mach 0.84) trims block time on every leg vs the Falcon 50EX.

CONS

  • Needs more runway than the Falcon 50EX (5,360 ft vs 4,600 ft) — fewer short-field options.

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 50EX

PROS

  • +Three-engine redundancy
  • +Short-runway capable heavy jet
  • +Trademark Falcon cabin quietness
  • +Shorter runway requirement (4,600 ft) unlocks airfields the Falcon 900EX cannot use.

CONS

  • Shorter range than the Falcon 900EX (3,200 nm vs 4,500 nm) — may require a tech stop on long sectors.
  • Maximum 9-seat layout is tight if you regularly travel with more than 9 — the Falcon 900EX adds 5 seats.
  • Slightly slower in cruise than the Falcon 900EX (Mach 0.80 vs Mach 0.84).
  • Lower ceiling than the Falcon 900EX (5'9" vs 6'2") — stand-up movement is restricted.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ten-person corporate delegation, London to New York, sleeping westbound

OUR PICKFalcon 900EX

Larger cabin seats the full group (12–14).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Multi-day Asia tour with two-stop routing and 14-passenger group

OUR PICKFalcon 900EX

Larger cabin seats the full group (12–14).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Family of eight relocating with significant baggage on a 3,500 nm leg

OUR PICKFalcon 900EX

Longer range (4,500 nm) wins the non-stop reach.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Sports team charter from Europe to the Middle East with kit

OUR PICKFalcon 900EX

Larger cabin seats the full group (12–14).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → New York3,000 nmFalcon 900EXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Paris → Dubai2,950 nmFalcon 900EXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Miami → São Paulo3,500 nmFalcon 900EXOnly one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (3500 nm > 3,200 nm).
Hong Kong → Sydney3,950 nmFalcon 900EXOnly one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (3950 nm > 3,200 nm).

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

Falcon 900EX vs Falcon 50EX — frequently asked

Falcon 900EX vs Falcon 50EX: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Dassault Falcon 900EX has a published range of 4,500 nm; the Dassault Falcon 50EX is rated at 3,200 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — Falcon 900EX or Falcon 50EX?OPEN

Cruise speeds are Mach 0.84 for the Dassault Falcon 900EX and Mach 0.80 for the Dassault Falcon 50EX. On a Paris → Dubai-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Dassault Falcon 900EX seats 12–14; the Dassault Falcon 50EX seats 9. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Dassault Falcon 900EX vs the Dassault Falcon 50EX?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Dassault Falcon 900EX from from €58,000, Dassault Falcon 50EX from from $32,800. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more heavy jets

FALCON 900EX × FALCON 50EX CLUSTER

Continue researching Falcon 900EX or Falcon 50EX

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE
Enquire now