Pilatus PC-12 NGX private jetDaher Kodiak 100 private jet

PC-12 NGX vs Kodiak 100

A head-to-head look at two of the most-chartered aircraft in the turboprop class.

Pilatus PC-12 NGX

PILATUS

Pilatus PC-12 NGX

The Pilatus PC-12 NGX is the world's most-delivered single-engine turbine aircraft — exceptional reliability, jet-style cabin appointments and unmatched short-runway access at the most economical operating cost in private aviation.

FULL PILATUS PC-12 NGX PAGE →
Daher Kodiak 100

DAHER

Daher Kodiak 100

The Daher Kodiak 100 is the rugged single-engine turboprop built for backcountry and unimproved-strip operations — short take-off and landing performance, cargo door and unpressurised cabin for true adventure missions.

FULL DAHER KODIAK 100 PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICPC-12 NGXKodiak 100
Passengers6–88
Range1,803 nm1,132 nm
Cruise speed290 kts183 kts
Cabin height4'10"4'6"
Cabin width5'0"4'6"
Baggage40 cu ft100 cu ft
Runway2,485 ft934 ft

Pilatus PC-12 NGX — strengths

  • Most-delivered single turbine in history
  • Lowest operating cost in segment
  • 2,485 ft runway capability

Daher Kodiak 100 — strengths

  • Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

PILATUS PC-12 NGX
Zurich → St Moritzfrom CHF 4,800
Denver → Aspenfrom $4,100
DAHER KODIAK 100
Bozeman → Yellowstone backcountryfrom $3,200
Cape Town → Kruger bush stripsfrom $4,800

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

Two closely-matched turboprops — the right pick depends entirely on the mission, not the spec sheet.

The PC-12 NGX pulls ahead on range / non-stop reach and cabin comfort; the Kodiak 100 answers with airport access. Both sit in the turboprop class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

PC-12 NGX

1,803 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.

Cabin comfort

PC-12 NGX

Taller and/or wider cabin (4'10" × 5'0") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

Even

Matched specifications.

Airport access

Kodiak 100

Shorter 934 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

Even

Comparable on this dimension.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the PC-12 NGX or the Kodiak 100.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the PC-12 NGX and Kodiak 100: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

PILATUS

Top reasons to choose the PC-12 NGX

  • Reaches 1,803 nm non-stop — 59% more range than the Kodiak 100, opening city pairs that would otherwise need a tech stop.
  • Bigger cabin envelope (4'10" tall × 5'0" wide) than the Kodiak 100 — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Most-delivered single turbine in history
  • Lowest operating cost in segment
  • 2,485 ft runway capability

BEST FOR

  • Longer non-stop reach

    When the mission is on the edge of the Kodiak 100's envelope, the 1,803 nm legs of the PC-12 NGX keep reserves intact.

  • Island & alpine access

    Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.

  • Sub-500 nm hops

    Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.

  • Cargo-heavy missions

    Large cabin door and floor loading for ski, dive and field-kit travel.

DAHER

Top reasons to choose the Kodiak 100

  • Lands in 934 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the PC-12 NGX cannot.
  • 100 cu ft of baggage volume — fits ski, golf and extended-stay luggage that crowds the PC-12 NGX.
  • Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    934 ft balanced field unlocks airports the PC-12 NGX cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Island & alpine access

    Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.

  • Sub-500 nm hops

    Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.

  • Cargo-heavy missions

    Large cabin door and floor loading for ski, dive and field-kit travel.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

PILATUS

Pilatus PC-12 NGX

PROS

  • +Most-delivered single turbine in history
  • +Lowest operating cost in segment
  • +2,485 ft runway capability
  • +Longer legs than the Kodiak 100 (1,803 nm vs 1,132 nm) — fewer fuel stops on intercontinental missions.
  • +Taller cabin (4'10") than the Kodiak 100 — easier to move around on long flights.
  • +Wider cabin (5'0") makes a meaningful difference at the shoulders vs the Kodiak 100.

CONS

  • Needs more runway than the Kodiak 100 (2,485 ft vs 934 ft) — fewer short-field options.
  • Tighter baggage capacity than the Kodiak 100 (40 cu ft vs 100 cu ft).

DAHER

Daher Kodiak 100

PROS

  • +Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • +Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • +Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions
  • +Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) unlocks airfields the PC-12 NGX cannot use.
  • +Larger baggage hold (100 cu ft) — useful for ski, golf or extended luggage vs the PC-12 NGX.

CONS

  • Shorter range than the PC-12 NGX (1,132 nm vs 1,803 nm) — may require a tech stop on long sectors.
  • Lower ceiling than the PC-12 NGX (4'6" vs 4'10") — stand-up movement is restricted.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ski-week shuttle into a short alpine strip

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Coastal island hop with bicycles and dive gear

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Regional medevac repositioning with stretcher kit

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Field-visit tour across three regional airports in one day

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → Le Touquet120 nmPC-12 NGXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Zurich → St Moritz95 nmPC-12 NGXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Aspen → Telluride115 nmPC-12 NGXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Nantucket → Teterboro180 nmPC-12 NGXBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

PC-12 NGX vs Kodiak 100 — frequently asked

PC-12 NGX vs Kodiak 100: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Pilatus PC-12 NGX has a published range of 1,803 nm; the Daher Kodiak 100 is rated at 1,132 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — PC-12 NGX or Kodiak 100?OPEN

Cruise speeds are 290 kts for the Pilatus PC-12 NGX and 183 kts for the Daher Kodiak 100. On a Zurich → St Moritz-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Pilatus PC-12 NGX seats 6–8; the Daher Kodiak 100 seats 8. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Pilatus PC-12 NGX vs the Daher Kodiak 100?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Pilatus PC-12 NGX from from CHF 4,800, Daher Kodiak 100 from from $3,200. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Turboprop category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more turboprops

PC-12 NGX × KODIAK 100 CLUSTER

Continue researching PC-12 NGX or Kodiak 100

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE