Beechcraft Beechcraft King Air 350i — Turboprop charter aircraftDaher Daher Kodiak 100 — Turboprop charter aircraft

King Air 350i vs Kodiak 100

A Beechcraft vs Daher showdown in the turboprop class. The Beechcraft King Air 350i carries 9 passengers with 1,806 nm of range; the Daher Kodiak 100 carries 8 with 1,132 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 4'9" × 4'6" versus 4'6" × 4'6", and runway numbers read 3,300 ft against 934 ft. Indicative charter pricing on a representative sector: from £2,900 on the Air 350i, from $3,200 on the Kodiak 100.

Manufacturer hubs:Beechcraft charter →
Beechcraft King Air 350i

BEECHCRAFT

Beechcraft King Air 350i

The Beechcraft King Air 350i is the most-chartered twin turboprop in the world. Nine passengers, short-runway access and the proven economics of the King Air platform make it ideal for regional missions to airports jets simply cannot use.

FULL BEECHCRAFT KING AIR 350I PAGE →
Daher Kodiak 100

DAHER

Daher Kodiak 100

The Daher Kodiak 100 is the rugged single-engine turboprop built for backcountry and unimproved-strip operations — short take-off and landing performance, cargo door and unpressurised cabin for true adventure missions.

FULL DAHER KODIAK 100 PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICKing Air 350iKodiak 100
Passengers98
Range1,806 nm1,132 nm
Cruise speed312 kts183 kts
Cabin height4'9"4'6"
Cabin width4'6"4'6"
Baggage55 cu ft100 cu ft
Runway3,300 ft934 ft

Beechcraft King Air 350i — strengths

  • Short and unpaved runway access
  • Lowest seat-mile cost in segment
  • Proven 50-year platform

Daher Kodiak 100 — strengths

  • Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

BEECHCRAFT KING AIR 350I
London → Cardifffrom £2,900
Denver → Telluridefrom $5,700
DAHER KODIAK 100
Bozeman → Yellowstone backcountryfrom $3,200
Cape Town → Kruger bush stripsfrom $4,800

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

The King Air 350i is the stronger all-rounder, but the Kodiak 100 still wins on the metrics that matter to specific buyers.

The King Air 350i pulls ahead on range / non-stop reach, cabin comfort and group capacity; the Kodiak 100 answers with airport access. Both sit in the turboprop class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

King Air 350i

1,806 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.

Cabin comfort

King Air 350i

Taller and/or wider cabin (4'9" × 4'6") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

King Air 350i

Seats up to 9 — the right pick when the manifest grows.

Airport access

Kodiak 100

Shorter 934 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

Even

Comparable on this dimension.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the King Air 350i or the Kodiak 100.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the King Air 350i and Kodiak 100: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

BEECHCRAFT

Top reasons to choose the King Air 350i

  • Reaches 1,806 nm non-stop — 60% more range than the Kodiak 100, opening city pairs that would otherwise need a tech stop.
  • Bigger cabin envelope (4'9" tall × 4'6" wide) than the Kodiak 100 — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Seats up to 9 passengers vs 8 on the Kodiak 100 — better for full-group charters and family travel.
  • Short and unpaved runway access
  • Lowest seat-mile cost in segment

BEST FOR

  • Longer non-stop reach

    When the mission is on the edge of the Kodiak 100's envelope, the 1,806 nm legs of the King Air 350i keep reserves intact.

  • Larger party charters

    Up to 9 seats vs 8 on the Kodiak 100 — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.

  • Island & alpine access

    Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.

  • Sub-500 nm hops

    Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.

DAHER

Top reasons to choose the Kodiak 100

  • Lands in 934 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the King Air 350i cannot.
  • 100 cu ft of baggage volume — fits ski, golf and extended-stay luggage that crowds the King Air 350i.
  • Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    934 ft balanced field unlocks airports the King Air 350i cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Island & alpine access

    Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.

  • Sub-500 nm hops

    Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.

  • Cargo-heavy missions

    Large cabin door and floor loading for ski, dive and field-kit travel.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

BEECHCRAFT

Beechcraft King Air 350i

PROS

  • +Short and unpaved runway access
  • +Lowest seat-mile cost in segment
  • +Proven 50-year platform
  • +Longer legs than the Kodiak 100 (1,806 nm vs 1,132 nm) — fewer fuel stops on intercontinental missions.
  • +Carries up to 9 passengers vs 8 on the Kodiak 100 — better for larger groups.
  • +Taller cabin (4'9") than the Kodiak 100 — easier to move around on long flights.

CONS

  • Needs more runway than the Kodiak 100 (3,300 ft vs 934 ft) — fewer short-field options.
  • Tighter baggage capacity than the Kodiak 100 (55 cu ft vs 100 cu ft).

DAHER

Daher Kodiak 100

PROS

  • +Sub-1,000 ft take-off run
  • +Unimproved-strip and gravel capable
  • +Best in class for safari, fishing and remote-charter missions
  • +Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) unlocks airfields the King Air 350i cannot use.
  • +Larger baggage hold (100 cu ft) — useful for ski, golf or extended luggage vs the King Air 350i.

CONS

  • Shorter range than the King Air 350i (1,132 nm vs 1,806 nm) — may require a tech stop on long sectors.
  • Maximum 8-seat layout is tight if you regularly travel with more than 8 — the King Air 350i adds 1 seat.
  • Lower ceiling than the King Air 350i (4'6" vs 4'9") — stand-up movement is restricted.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ski-week shuttle into a short alpine strip

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Coastal island hop with bicycles and dive gear

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Regional medevac repositioning with stretcher kit

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Field-visit tour across three regional airports in one day

OUR PICKKodiak 100

Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → Le Touquet120 nmKing Air 350iBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Zurich → St Moritz95 nmKing Air 350iBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Aspen → Telluride115 nmKing Air 350iBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Nantucket → Teterboro180 nmKing Air 350iBoth reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

King Air 350i vs Kodiak 100 — frequently asked

King Air 350i vs Kodiak 100: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Beechcraft King Air 350i has a published range of 1,806 nm; the Daher Kodiak 100 is rated at 1,132 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — King Air 350i or Kodiak 100?OPEN

Cruise speeds are 312 kts for the Beechcraft King Air 350i and 183 kts for the Daher Kodiak 100. On a London → Cardiff-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Beechcraft King Air 350i seats 9; the Daher Kodiak 100 seats 8. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Beechcraft King Air 350i vs the Daher Kodiak 100?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Beechcraft King Air 350i from from £2,900, Daher Kodiak 100 from from $3,200. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Turboprop category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

How much cabin space does the King Air 350i have vs the Kodiak 100?OPEN

Cabin comfort is the everyday difference passengers feel most. Both the Beechcraft King Air 350i and Daher Kodiak 100 sit in the Turboprop class, so cabin height, width and layout differ subtly — on flights over 3 hours those details matter more than raw range. Ask us for a side-by-side floorplan.

Which aircraft is safer — King Air 350i or Kodiak 100?OPEN

Both aircraft in this comparison are operated under ARG/US, Wyvern or IS-BAO safety programmes when chartered through Limitless Sky. Safety is driven by operator, crew currency and maintenance regime — not the airframe. We only book operators meeting our verified due-diligence checklist.

What's the total mission cost — not just the hourly rate?OPEN

Hourly pricing (from £2,900 for the King Air 350i, from $3,200 for the Kodiak 100) is only one input. Total mission cost includes positioning legs, overnight fees, landing/handling, catering, de-icing and FET where applicable. Our confirmed quote itemises every line so there are no surprises.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more turboprops

KING AIR 350I × KODIAK 100 CLUSTER

Continue researching King Air 350i or Kodiak 100

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE
Book HereDo you have a question?