Gulfstream G600 private jetBombardier Challenger 605 private jet

G600 vs Challenger 605

A head-to-head look at two of the most-chartered aircraft in the heavy jet class.

Gulfstream G600

GULFSTREAM

Gulfstream G600

The Gulfstream G600 stretches the G500 platform to 6,600 nm of range — enough for London to Tokyo or New York to Dubai nonstop — with three living zones, Symmetry flight deck and panoramic Gulfstream windows.

FULL GULFSTREAM G600 PAGE →
Bombardier Challenger 605

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

The Bombardier Challenger 605 updated the 604 with the Rockwell Collins Pro Line 21 flight deck, larger windows and improved cabin lighting. Same 4,000 nm range and same widest-floor cabin in the class.

FULL BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605 PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICG600Challenger 605
Passengers13–199–12
Range6,600 nm4,000 nm
Cruise speedMach 0.90Mach 0.80
Cabin height6'3"6'1"
Cabin width7'7"8'2"
Baggage175 cu ft115 cu ft
Runway5,700 ft5,840 ft

Gulfstream G600 — strengths

  • 6,600 nm true intercontinental range
  • Active-control sidesticks
  • Heavy-jet pricing with ultra-long-range capability

Bombardier Challenger 605 — strengths

  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

GULFSTREAM G600
Geneva → Singaporefrom CHF 158,000
Hong Kong → Londonfrom $156,000
BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605
Miami → Sao Paulofrom $56,000
Hong Kong → Dubaifrom $62,000

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

The G600 is the stronger all-rounder, but the Challenger 605 still wins on the metrics that matter to specific buyers.

The G600 pulls ahead on range / non-stop reach, group capacity, airport access and speed & block time; the Challenger 605 answers with cabin comfort. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

G600

6,600 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.

Cabin comfort

Challenger 605

Taller and/or wider cabin (6'1" × 8'2") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

G600

Seats up to 19 — the right pick when the manifest grows.

Airport access

G600

Shorter 5,700 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

G600

Cruise of Mach 0.90 — shaves meaningful minutes off every long leg.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the G600 or the Challenger 605.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the G600 and Challenger 605: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

GULFSTREAM

Top reasons to choose the G600

  • Reaches 6,600 nm non-stop — 65% more range than the Challenger 605, opening city pairs that would otherwise need a tech stop.
  • Cruises at Mach 0.90, trimming block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605 (Mach 0.80).
  • Seats up to 19 passengers vs 12 on the Challenger 605 — better for full-group charters and family travel.
  • 175 cu ft of baggage volume — fits ski, golf and extended-stay luggage that crowds the Challenger 605.
  • 6,600 nm true intercontinental range

BEST FOR

  • Longer non-stop reach

    When the mission is on the edge of the Challenger 605's envelope, the 6,600 nm legs of the G600 keep reserves intact.

  • Larger party charters

    Up to 19 seats vs 12 on the Challenger 605 — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

BOMBARDIER

Top reasons to choose the Challenger 605

  • Bigger cabin envelope (6'1" tall × 8'2" wide) than the G600 — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

BEST FOR

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

  • Family relocations

    Range and payload for one-stop global moves with significant baggage.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

GULFSTREAM

Gulfstream G600

PROS

  • +6,600 nm true intercontinental range
  • +Active-control sidesticks
  • +Heavy-jet pricing with ultra-long-range capability
  • +Longer legs than the Challenger 605 (6,600 nm vs 4,000 nm) — fewer fuel stops on intercontinental missions.
  • +Carries up to 19 passengers vs 12 on the Challenger 605 — better for larger groups.
  • +Faster cruise (Mach 0.90) trims block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605.

CONS

  • Marginally more expensive per block hour than the Challenger 605 on typical charter quotes — confirm with a live quote for your route.

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

PROS

  • +Pro Line 21 avionics
  • +Larger windows than 604
  • +Wide-body heavy-jet floor
  • +Wider cabin (8'2") makes a meaningful difference at the shoulders vs the G600.

CONS

  • Shorter range than the G600 (4,000 nm vs 6,600 nm) — may require a tech stop on long sectors.
  • Maximum 12-seat layout is tight if you regularly travel with more than 12 — the G600 adds 7 seats.
  • Slightly slower in cruise than the G600 (Mach 0.80 vs Mach 0.90).
  • Lower ceiling than the G600 (6'1" vs 6'3") — stand-up movement is restricted.
  • Tighter baggage capacity than the G600 (115 cu ft vs 175 cu ft).

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ten-person corporate delegation, London to New York, sleeping westbound

OUR PICKG600

Larger cabin seats the full group (13–19).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Multi-day Asia tour with two-stop routing and 14-passenger group

OUR PICKG600

Larger cabin seats the full group (13–19).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Family of eight relocating with significant baggage on a 3,500 nm leg

OUR PICKG600

Longer range (6,600 nm) wins the non-stop reach.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Sports team charter from Europe to the Middle East with kit

OUR PICKG600

Larger cabin seats the full group (13–19).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → New York3,000 nmG600Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Paris → Dubai2,950 nmG600Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Miami → São Paulo3,500 nmG600Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes.
Hong Kong → Sydney3,950 nmG600Only one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (3950 nm > 4,000 nm).

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

G600 vs Challenger 605 — frequently asked

G600 vs Challenger 605: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Gulfstream G600 has a published range of 6,600 nm; the Bombardier Challenger 605 is rated at 4,000 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — G600 or Challenger 605?OPEN

Cruise speeds are Mach 0.90 for the Gulfstream G600 and Mach 0.80 for the Bombardier Challenger 605. On a Geneva → Singapore-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Gulfstream G600 seats 13–19; the Bombardier Challenger 605 seats 9–12. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Gulfstream G600 vs the Bombardier Challenger 605?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Gulfstream G600 from from CHF 158,000, Bombardier Challenger 605 from from $56,000. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more heavy jets

G600 × CHALLENGER 605 CLUSTER

Continue researching G600 or Challenger 605

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE