A Cessna vs Daher showdown in the turboprop class. The Cessna Grand Caravan EX carries 9 passengers with 912 nm of range; the Daher Kodiak 100 carries 8 with 1,132 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 4'6" × 5'4" versus 4'6" × 4'6", and runway numbers read 2,160 ft against 934 ft.
CESSNA
The Cessna Grand Caravan EX is the world's most popular utility turboprop. Nine passengers, rugged short-strip capability and proven Pratt & Whitney power make it the default choice for Caribbean, Greek and Indian Ocean island hopping.
FULL CESSNA GRAND CARAVAN EX PAGE →DAHER
The Daher Kodiak 100 is the rugged single-engine turboprop built for backcountry and unimproved-strip operations — short take-off and landing performance, cargo door and unpressurised cabin for true adventure missions.
FULL DAHER KODIAK 100 PAGE →SPECIFICATIONS
| METRIC | Grand Caravan EX | Kodiak 100 |
|---|---|---|
| Passengers | 9 | 8 |
| Range | 912 nm | 1,132 nm |
| Cruise speed | 185 ktas | 183 kts |
| Cabin height | 4'6" | 4'6" |
| Cabin width | 5'4" | 4'6" |
| Baggage | 143 cu ft | 100 cu ft |
| Runway | 2,160 ft | 934 ft |
CHARTER PRICING
| Nassau → Exuma | Estimate on request |
| Mahé → Praslin | Estimate on request |
| Bozeman → Yellowstone backcountry | Estimate on request |
| Cape Town → Kruger bush strips | Estimate on request |
One-way estimates from our pricing engine (standard season), estimated, confirmed quote within 1–2 hours.
EXPERT VERDICT
The Grand Caravan EX pulls ahead on cabin comfort and group capacity; the Kodiak 100 answers with range / non-stop reach and airport access. Both sit in the turboprop class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.
Range / non-stop reach
Kodiak 100
1,132 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.
Cabin comfort
Grand Caravan EX
Taller and/or wider cabin (4'6" × 5'4") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.
Group capacity
Grand Caravan EX
Seats up to 9 — the right pick when the manifest grows.
Airport access
Kodiak 100
Shorter 934 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.
Speed & block time
Even
Comparable on this dimension.
Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.
REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE
Tell us your route — our desk returns estimated prices on both aircraft straight away and confirmed options within 1–2 hours, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.
CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE
A tailored summary for the Grand Caravan EX and Kodiak 100: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.
CESSNA
BEST FOR
Larger party charters
Up to 9 seats vs 8 on the Kodiak 100 — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.
Island & alpine access
Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.
Sub-500 nm hops
Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.
Cargo-heavy missions
Large cabin door and floor loading for ski, dive and field-kit travel.
DAHER
BEST FOR
Longer non-stop reach
When the mission is on the edge of the Grand Caravan EX's envelope, the 1,132 nm legs of the Kodiak 100 keep reserves intact.
Short-field departures
934 ft balanced field unlocks airports the Grand Caravan EX cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.
Island & alpine access
Short, unpaved or high-altitude strips that jets simply cannot use.
Sub-500 nm hops
Operating cost per seat-mile beats every jet on quick regional legs.
PROS & CONS
CESSNA
PROS
CONS
DAHER
PROS
CONS
REAL-WORLD MISSIONS
Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.
SCENARIO 01
Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 02
Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 03
Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 04
Shorter runway requirement (934 ft) opens up the airfield.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS
| ROUTE | DISTANCE | RECOMMENDED | WHY |
|---|---|---|---|
| London → Le Touquet | 120 nm | Kodiak 100 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
| Zurich → St Moritz | 95 nm | Kodiak 100 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
| Aspen → Telluride | 115 nm | Kodiak 100 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
| Nantucket → Teterboro | 180 nm | Kodiak 100 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.
FAQ
The Cessna Grand Caravan EX has a published range of 912 nm; the Daher Kodiak 100 is rated at 1,132 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.
Cruise speeds are 185 ktas for the Cessna Grand Caravan EX and 183 kts for the Daher Kodiak 100. The difference in block time grows with trip length; on a Male → Resort islands (Maldives) trip it is usually minutes rather than hours.
The Cessna Grand Caravan EX seats 9; the Daher Kodiak 100 seats 8. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.
From our pricing engine's class rates: the Cessna Grand Caravan EX on request (no class rate in our pricing engine), and the Daher Kodiak 100 on request (no class rate in our pricing engine). These are estimates; the confirmed quote within 1–2 hours depends on positioning, season and airport fees.
The Cessna Grand Caravan EX cabin is 4'6" high and 5'4" wide; the Daher Kodiak 100 is 4'6" high and 4'6" wide. Baggage: 143 cu ft vs 100 cu ft.
For trips within the Cessna Grand Caravan EX's published 912 nm, either aircraft can fly non-stop and the choice comes down to cabin (4'6" vs 4'6" cabin height), seats (9 vs 8) and price. Beyond that, the Daher Kodiak 100 (1,132 nm) flies non-stop where the Cessna Grand Caravan EX may need a fuel stop. Real-world range drops with passengers, bags, winds and winter reserves, so we confirm it per trip.
Both belong to the Turboprop category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.
Cabin comfort is the everyday difference passengers feel most. Both the Cessna Grand Caravan EX and Daher Kodiak 100 sit in the Turboprop class, so cabin height, width and layout differ subtly — on flights over 3 hours those details matter more than raw range. Ask us for a side-by-side floorplan.
Both aircraft in this comparison are operated under ARG/US, Wyvern or IS-BAO safety programmes when chartered through Limitless Sky. Safety is driven by operator, crew currency and maintenance regime — not the airframe. We only book operators meeting our verified due-diligence checklist.
The hourly class rate is only one input. Total mission cost includes positioning legs, overnight fees, landing/handling, catering, de-icing and FET where applicable. Our confirmed quote itemises every line so there are no surprises.
MORE COMPARISONS
GRAND CARAVAN EX × KODIAK 100 CLUSTER
CHARTER EITHER AIRCRAFT
EDITORIAL GUIDES
CHARTER THESE AIRCRAFT FOR YOUR TRIP
POPULAR COMPARISONS
Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed options within 1–2 hours.
REQUEST A QUOTE