Bombardier Bombardier Challenger 605 — Heavy Jet charter aircraftDassault Dassault Falcon 900B — Heavy Jet charter aircraft

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 900B

A Bombardier vs Dassault showdown in the heavy jet class. The Bombardier Challenger 605 carries 9–12 passengers with 4,000 nm of range; the Dassault Falcon 900B carries 12 with 4,000 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 6'1" × 8'2" versus 6'2" × 7'8", and runway numbers read 5,840 ft against 5,215 ft. Indicative charter pricing on a representative sector: from $56,000 on the Challenger 605, from €44,800 on the Falcon 900B.

Bombardier Challenger 605

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

The Bombardier Challenger 605 updated the 604 with the Rockwell Collins Pro Line 21 flight deck, larger windows and improved cabin lighting. Same 4,000 nm range and same widest-floor cabin in the class.

FULL BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605 PAGE →
Dassault Falcon 900B

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 900B

The Dassault Falcon 900B was the first stretched, higher-thrust development of the original Falcon 900 line — three Honeywell TFE731-5BR engines, 4,000 nm of range and three-zone Falcon cabin comfort at charter rates well below the 900EX and 900LX.

FULL DASSAULT FALCON 900B PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICChallenger 605Falcon 900B
Passengers9–1212
Range4,000 nm4,000 nm
Cruise speedMach 0.80Mach 0.84
Cabin height6'1"6'2"
Cabin width8'2"7'8"
Baggage115 cu ft127 cu ft
Runway5,840 ft5,215 ft

Bombardier Challenger 605 — strengths

  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

Dassault Falcon 900B — strengths

  • Three-engine trijet reliability at value pricing
  • Genuine transatlantic non-stop capability
  • Full three-zone Falcon cabin

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605
Miami → Sao Paulofrom $56,000
Hong Kong → Dubaifrom $62,000
DASSAULT FALCON 900B
Paris → Riyadhfrom €44,800
Miami → São Paulofrom $48,000

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

Two closely-matched heavy jets — the right pick depends entirely on the mission, not the spec sheet.

The Challenger 605 pulls ahead on cabin comfort; the Falcon 900B answers with airport access and speed & block time. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

Even

Matched specifications.

Cabin comfort

Challenger 605

Taller and/or wider cabin (6'1" × 8'2") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

Even

Matched specifications.

Airport access

Falcon 900B

Shorter 5,215 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

Falcon 900B

Cruise of Mach 0.84 — shaves meaningful minutes off every long leg.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the Challenger 605 or the Falcon 900B.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the Challenger 605 and Falcon 900B: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

BOMBARDIER

Top reasons to choose the Challenger 605

  • Bigger cabin envelope (6'1" tall × 8'2" wide) than the Falcon 900B — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

BEST FOR

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

  • Family relocations

    Range and payload for one-stop global moves with significant baggage.

DASSAULT

Top reasons to choose the Falcon 900B

  • Cruises at Mach 0.84, trimming block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605 (Mach 0.80).
  • Lands in 5,215 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the Challenger 605 cannot.
  • Three-engine trijet reliability at value pricing
  • Genuine transatlantic non-stop capability
  • Full three-zone Falcon cabin

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    5,215 ft balanced field unlocks airports the Challenger 605 cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

PROS

  • +Pro Line 21 avionics
  • +Larger windows than 604
  • +Wide-body heavy-jet floor
  • +Wider cabin (8'2") makes a meaningful difference at the shoulders vs the Falcon 900B.

CONS

  • Slightly slower in cruise than the Falcon 900B (Mach 0.80 vs Mach 0.84).
  • Needs more runway than the Falcon 900B (5,840 ft vs 5,215 ft) — fewer short-field options.

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 900B

PROS

  • +Three-engine trijet reliability at value pricing
  • +Genuine transatlantic non-stop capability
  • +Full three-zone Falcon cabin
  • +Faster cruise (Mach 0.84) trims block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605.
  • +Shorter runway requirement (5,215 ft) unlocks airfields the Challenger 605 cannot use.

CONS

  • Marginally more expensive per block hour than the Challenger 605 on typical charter quotes — confirm with a live quote for your route.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ten-person corporate delegation, London to New York, sleeping westbound

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Multi-day Asia tour with two-stop routing and 14-passenger group

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Family of eight relocating with significant baggage on a 3,500 nm leg

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Longer range (4,000 nm) wins the non-stop reach.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Sports team charter from Europe to the Middle East with kit

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → New York3,000 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Paris → Dubai2,950 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Miami → São Paulo3,500 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Hong Kong → Sydney3,950 nmEitherBoth would require a tech stop on this routing — talk to us about positioning.

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 900B — frequently asked

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 900B: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Bombardier Challenger 605 has a published range of 4,000 nm; the Dassault Falcon 900B is rated at 4,000 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — Challenger 605 or Falcon 900B?OPEN

Cruise speeds are Mach 0.80 for the Bombardier Challenger 605 and Mach 0.84 for the Dassault Falcon 900B. On a Miami → Sao Paulo-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Bombardier Challenger 605 seats 9–12; the Dassault Falcon 900B seats 12. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Bombardier Challenger 605 vs the Dassault Falcon 900B?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Bombardier Challenger 605 from from $56,000, Dassault Falcon 900B from from €44,800. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more heavy jets

CHALLENGER 605 × FALCON 900B CLUSTER

Continue researching Challenger 605 or Falcon 900B

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE
Enquire now