Bombardier Challenger 605 private jetDassault Falcon 2000LXS private jet

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 2000LXS

A head-to-head look at two of the most-chartered aircraft in the heavy jet class.

Bombardier Challenger 605

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

The Bombardier Challenger 605 updated the 604 with the Rockwell Collins Pro Line 21 flight deck, larger windows and improved cabin lighting. Same 4,000 nm range and same widest-floor cabin in the class.

FULL BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605 PAGE →
Dassault Falcon 2000LXS

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 2000LXS

The Dassault Falcon 2000LXS combines wide-body heavy-jet cabin space with short-runway capability that rivals super-midsize jets. Ten passengers fly transcontinental in genuine comfort, with access to airports most heavy jets cannot use — including London City.

FULL DASSAULT FALCON 2000LXS PAGE →

SPECIFICATIONS

Side-by-side specifications

METRICChallenger 605Falcon 2000LXS
Passengers9–1210
Range4,000 nm4,000 nm
Cruise speedMach 0.80Mach 0.85
Cabin height6'1"6'2"
Cabin width8'2"7'8"
Baggage115 cu ft131 cu ft
Runway5,840 ft4,675 ft

Bombardier Challenger 605 — strengths

  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

Dassault Falcon 2000LXS — strengths

  • Widest cabin in segment
  • London City certified
  • Industry-leading Dassault build quality

CHARTER PRICING

Indicative pricing

BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605
Miami → Sao Paulofrom $56,000
Hong Kong → Dubaifrom $62,000
DASSAULT FALCON 2000LXS
Geneva → Riyadhfrom CHF 64,000
Teterboro → Los Angelesfrom $34,800

All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

EXPERT VERDICT

Two closely-matched heavy jets — the right pick depends entirely on the mission, not the spec sheet.

The Challenger 605 pulls ahead on cabin comfort and group capacity; the Falcon 2000LXS answers with airport access and speed & block time. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.

Range / non-stop reach

Even

Matched specifications.

Cabin comfort

Challenger 605

Taller and/or wider cabin (6'1" × 8'2") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.

Group capacity

Challenger 605

Seats up to 12 — the right pick when the manifest grows.

Airport access

Falcon 2000LXS

Shorter 4,675 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.

Speed & block time

Falcon 2000LXS

Cruise of Mach 0.85 — shaves meaningful minutes off every long leg.

Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.

REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE

Charter the Challenger 605 or the Falcon 2000LXS.

Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.

CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE

Top reasons to choose — and who each aircraft is best for

A tailored summary for the Challenger 605 and Falcon 2000LXS: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.

BOMBARDIER

Top reasons to choose the Challenger 605

  • Bigger cabin envelope (6'1" tall × 8'2" wide) than the Falcon 2000LXS — meaningful difference on flights over three hours.
  • Seats up to 12 passengers vs 10 on the Falcon 2000LXS — better for full-group charters and family travel.
  • Pro Line 21 avionics
  • Larger windows than 604
  • Wide-body heavy-jet floor

BEST FOR

  • Larger party charters

    Up to 12 seats vs 10 on the Falcon 2000LXS — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

DASSAULT

Top reasons to choose the Falcon 2000LXS

  • Cruises at Mach 0.85, trimming block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605 (Mach 0.80).
  • Lands in 4,675 ft balanced field — accesses short, restricted and city-adjacent airports the Challenger 605 cannot.
  • Widest cabin in segment
  • London City certified
  • Industry-leading Dassault build quality

BEST FOR

  • Short-field departures

    4,675 ft balanced field unlocks airports the Challenger 605 cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.

  • Intercontinental sleep flights

    Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.

  • 10–14 passenger groups

    Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.

  • Two-zone living

    Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.

PROS & CONS

Honest assessment

BOMBARDIER

Bombardier Challenger 605

PROS

  • +Pro Line 21 avionics
  • +Larger windows than 604
  • +Wide-body heavy-jet floor
  • +Carries up to 12 passengers vs 10 on the Falcon 2000LXS — better for larger groups.
  • +Wider cabin (8'2") makes a meaningful difference at the shoulders vs the Falcon 2000LXS.

CONS

  • Slightly slower in cruise than the Falcon 2000LXS (Mach 0.80 vs Mach 0.85).
  • Needs more runway than the Falcon 2000LXS (5,840 ft vs 4,675 ft) — fewer short-field options.

DASSAULT

Dassault Falcon 2000LXS

PROS

  • +Widest cabin in segment
  • +London City certified
  • +Industry-leading Dassault build quality
  • +Faster cruise (Mach 0.85) trims block time on every leg vs the Challenger 605.
  • +Shorter runway requirement (4,675 ft) unlocks airfields the Challenger 605 cannot use.

CONS

  • Maximum 10-seat layout is tight if you regularly travel with more than 10 — the Challenger 605 adds 2 seats.

REAL-WORLD MISSIONS

Which aircraft for which mission

Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.

SCENARIO 01

Ten-person corporate delegation, London to New York, sleeping westbound

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 02

Multi-day Asia tour with two-stop routing and 14-passenger group

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 03

Family of eight relocating with significant baggage on a 3,500 nm leg

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Longer range (4,000 nm) wins the non-stop reach.

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

SCENARIO 04

Sports team charter from Europe to the Middle East with kit

OUR PICKChallenger 605

Larger cabin seats the full group (9–12).

SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →

ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS

Best pick per route

ROUTEDISTANCERECOMMENDEDWHY
London → New York3,000 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Paris → Dubai2,950 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Miami → São Paulo3,500 nmEitherBoth aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price.
Hong Kong → Sydney3,950 nmEitherBoth would require a tech stop on this routing — talk to us about positioning.

Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.

FAQ

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 2000LXS — frequently asked

Challenger 605 vs Falcon 2000LXS: which has the longer range?OPEN

The Bombardier Challenger 605 has a published range of 4,000 nm; the Dassault Falcon 2000LXS is rated at 4,000 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.

Which is faster — Challenger 605 or Falcon 2000LXS?OPEN

Cruise speeds are Mach 0.80 for the Bombardier Challenger 605 and Mach 0.85 for the Dassault Falcon 2000LXS. On a Miami → Sao Paulo-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.

How many passengers does each aircraft carry?OPEN

The Bombardier Challenger 605 seats 9–12; the Dassault Falcon 2000LXS seats 10. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.

What does it cost to charter the Bombardier Challenger 605 vs the Dassault Falcon 2000LXS?OPEN

Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Bombardier Challenger 605 from from $56,000, Dassault Falcon 2000LXS from from CHF 64,000. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.

Which aircraft is better for transatlantic or long-range missions?OPEN

Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.

MORE COMPARISONS

Compare more heavy jets

CHALLENGER 605 × FALCON 2000LXS CLUSTER

Continue researching Challenger 605 or Falcon 2000LXS

Not sure which to charter?

Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.

REQUEST A QUOTE