A Gulfstream vs Bombardier showdown in the heavy jet class. The Gulfstream G350 carries 14 passengers with 3,800 nm of range; the Bombardier Challenger 605 carries 9–12 with 4,000 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 6'2" × 7'4" versus 6'1" × 8'2", and runway numbers read 5,050 ft against 5,840 ft. Indicative charter pricing on a representative sector: from CHF 44,000 on the Gulfstream G350, from $56,000 on the Challenger 605.
GULFSTREAM
The Gulfstream G350 is a short-range derivative of the G450 — the same fuselage, cabin and PlaneView flight deck with reduced fuel capacity and 3,800 nm of range at a materially lower hourly cost. The Gulfstream heavy cabin on transcontinental missions rather than transatlantic.
FULL GULFSTREAM G350 PAGE →BOMBARDIER
The Bombardier Challenger 605 updated the 604 with the Rockwell Collins Pro Line 21 flight deck, larger windows and improved cabin lighting. Same 4,000 nm range and same widest-floor cabin in the class.
FULL BOMBARDIER CHALLENGER 605 PAGE →SPECIFICATIONS
| METRIC | G350 | Challenger 605 |
|---|---|---|
| Passengers | 14 | 9–12 |
| Range | 3,800 nm | 4,000 nm |
| Cruise speed | Mach 0.80 | Mach 0.80 |
| Cabin height | 6'2" | 6'1" |
| Cabin width | 7'4" | 8'2" |
| Baggage | 169 cu ft | 115 cu ft |
| Runway | 5,050 ft | 5,840 ft |
CHARTER PRICING
| Geneva → Cairo | from CHF 44,000 |
| Miami → Bogotá | from $42,000 |
| Miami → Sao Paulo | from $56,000 |
| Hong Kong → Dubai | from $62,000 |
All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.
EXPERT VERDICT
The G350 pulls ahead on group capacity and airport access; the Challenger 605 answers with range / non-stop reach and cabin comfort. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.
Range / non-stop reach
Challenger 605
4,000 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.
Cabin comfort
Challenger 605
Taller and/or wider cabin (6'1" × 8'2") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.
Group capacity
G350
Seats up to 14 — the right pick when the manifest grows.
Airport access
G350
Shorter 5,050 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.
Speed & block time
Even
Matched specifications.
Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.
REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE
Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.
CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE
A tailored summary for the G350 and Challenger 605: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.
GULFSTREAM
BEST FOR
Larger party charters
Up to 14 seats vs 12 on the Challenger 605 — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.
Short-field departures
5,050 ft balanced field unlocks airports the Challenger 605 cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.
Intercontinental sleep flights
Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.
10–14 passenger groups
Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.
BOMBARDIER
BEST FOR
Intercontinental sleep flights
Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.
10–14 passenger groups
Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.
Two-zone living
Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.
Family relocations
Range and payload for one-stop global moves with significant baggage.
PROS & CONS
GULFSTREAM
PROS
CONS
BOMBARDIER
PROS
CONS
REAL-WORLD MISSIONS
Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.
SCENARIO 01
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 02
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 03
Longer range (4,000 nm) wins the non-stop reach.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 04
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS
| ROUTE | DISTANCE | RECOMMENDED | WHY |
|---|---|---|---|
| London → New York | 3,000 nm | Either | Both aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price. |
| Paris → Dubai | 2,950 nm | Either | Both aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price. |
| Miami → São Paulo | 3,500 nm | Either | Both aircraft fly this comfortably non-stop — choose on cabin and price. |
| Hong Kong → Sydney | 3,950 nm | Either | Both would require a tech stop on this routing — talk to us about positioning. |
Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.
FAQ
The Gulfstream G350 has a published range of 3,800 nm; the Bombardier Challenger 605 is rated at 4,000 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.
Cruise speeds are Mach 0.80 for the Gulfstream G350 and Mach 0.80 for the Bombardier Challenger 605. On a Geneva → Cairo-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.
The Gulfstream G350 seats 14; the Bombardier Challenger 605 seats 9–12. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.
Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Gulfstream G350 from from CHF 44,000, Bombardier Challenger 605 from from $56,000. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.
Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.
MORE COMPARISONS
G350 × CHALLENGER 605 CLUSTER
CHARTER EITHER AIRCRAFT
EDITORIAL GUIDES
Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.
REQUEST A QUOTE