A Gulfstream vs Dassault showdown in the heavy jet class. The Gulfstream G350 carries 14 passengers with 3,800 nm of range; the Dassault Falcon 50EX carries 9 with 3,200 nm. Cabin dimensions land at 6'2" × 7'4" versus 5'9" × 6'1", and runway numbers read 5,050 ft against 4,600 ft. Indicative charter pricing on a representative sector: from CHF 44,000 on the Gulfstream G350, from $32,800 on the Falcon 50EX.
GULFSTREAM
The Gulfstream G350 is a short-range derivative of the G450 — the same fuselage, cabin and PlaneView flight deck with reduced fuel capacity and 3,800 nm of range at a materially lower hourly cost. The Gulfstream heavy cabin on transcontinental missions rather than transatlantic.
FULL GULFSTREAM G350 PAGE →DASSAULT
The Dassault Falcon 50EX is the only three-engine business jet in regular charter service — exceptional short-runway performance, 3,200 nm range and the unmistakable Falcon ride quality.
FULL DASSAULT FALCON 50EX PAGE →SPECIFICATIONS
| METRIC | G350 | Falcon 50EX |
|---|---|---|
| Passengers | 14 | 9 |
| Range | 3,800 nm | 3,200 nm |
| Cruise speed | Mach 0.80 | Mach 0.80 |
| Cabin height | 6'2" | 5'9" |
| Cabin width | 7'4" | 6'1" |
| Baggage | 169 cu ft | 115 cu ft |
| Runway | 5,050 ft | 4,600 ft |
CHARTER PRICING
| Geneva → Cairo | from CHF 44,000 |
| Miami → Bogotá | from $42,000 |
| Miami → Aspen | from $32,800 |
| Paris → Athens | from €28,400 |
All-inclusive indicative one-way pricing. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes.
EXPERT VERDICT
The G350 pulls ahead on range / non-stop reach, cabin comfort and group capacity; the Falcon 50EX answers with airport access. Both sit in the heavy jet class, so charter pricing is broadly aligned — let the use case (range, group size, airport pair) drive the final call.
Range / non-stop reach
G350
3,800 nm of range — the better choice for transcontinental and intercontinental missions.
Cabin comfort
G350
Taller and/or wider cabin (6'2" × 7'4") — better for long flights and stand-up movement.
Group capacity
G350
Seats up to 14 — the right pick when the manifest grows.
Airport access
Falcon 50EX
Shorter 4,600 ft balanced-field requirement — opens up restricted alpine, island and city-adjacent airfields.
Speed & block time
Even
Matched specifications.
Verdict based on published manufacturer specifications, charter market data and Limitless Sky brokerage experience.
REQUEST A CHARTER QUOTE
Tell us your route — our desk returns a confirmed quote on both aircraft within 10 minutes, so you can compare like-for-like on your exact mission.
CHOOSE WITH CONFIDENCE
A tailored summary for the G350 and Falcon 50EX: the deciding reasons in this matchup, plus the buyer archetypes each aircraft serves best.
GULFSTREAM
BEST FOR
Longer non-stop reach
When the mission is on the edge of the Falcon 50EX's envelope, the 3,800 nm legs of the G350 keep reserves intact.
Larger party charters
Up to 14 seats vs 9 on the Falcon 50EX — the natural pick when the manifest grows last-minute.
Intercontinental sleep flights
Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.
10–14 passenger groups
Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.
DASSAULT
BEST FOR
Short-field departures
4,600 ft balanced field unlocks airports the G350 cannot use, putting passengers closer to the door.
Intercontinental sleep flights
Lie-flat berths for overnight Europe–US, Europe–Gulf and Asia legs.
10–14 passenger groups
Real space for a full delegation plus support staff.
Two-zone living
Separate work, dine and rest areas on flights over six hours.
PROS & CONS
GULFSTREAM
PROS
CONS
DASSAULT
PROS
CONS
REAL-WORLD MISSIONS
Four scenarios our charter desk sees regularly — and which of these two we would actually quote.
SCENARIO 01
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 02
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 03
Longer range (3,800 nm) wins the non-stop reach.
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →SCENARIO 04
Larger cabin seats the full group (14).
SEE FULL AIRCRAFT →ROUTE RECOMMENDATIONS
| ROUTE | DISTANCE | RECOMMENDED | WHY |
|---|---|---|---|
| London → New York | 3,000 nm | G350 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
| Paris → Dubai | 2,950 nm | G350 | Both reach it, but the longer-legged option keeps more fuel reserves for weather and routing changes. |
| Miami → São Paulo | 3,500 nm | G350 | Only one reaches non-stop — the other would need a fuel stop (3500 nm > 3,200 nm). |
| Hong Kong → Sydney | 3,950 nm | Either | Both would require a tech stop on this routing — talk to us about positioning. |
Distances are great-circle approximations; actual fuel planning accounts for winds, weather and reserves.
FAQ
The Gulfstream G350 has a published range of 3,800 nm; the Dassault Falcon 50EX is rated at 3,200 nm. The longer-range aircraft opens up more non-stop city pairs without a tech stop.
Cruise speeds are Mach 0.80 for the Gulfstream G350 and Mach 0.80 for the Dassault Falcon 50EX. On a Geneva → Cairo-style mission the faster aircraft typically saves 10–25 minutes block time.
The Gulfstream G350 seats 14; the Dassault Falcon 50EX seats 9. Charter prices below assume a typical executive layout — high-density configurations are available on request.
Indicative one-way pricing on a benchmark mission: Gulfstream G350 from from CHF 44,000, Dassault Falcon 50EX from from $32,800. Confirmed quote in 10 minutes — pricing varies with empty-leg availability, season and routing.
Both belong to the Heavy Jet category, but range, payload and runway performance differ. See the route-recommendations table on this page for our specific pick per corridor.
MORE COMPARISONS
G350 × FALCON 50EX CLUSTER
CHARTER EITHER AIRCRAFT
WHERE THESE AIRCRAFT FLY
EDITORIAL GUIDES
Tell us your route and party size — we'll recommend the right aircraft and send a confirmed quote in 10 minutes.
REQUEST A QUOTE